Rust 2: What We Can Learn from Facepunch Studios' Critique of Unity

The gaming world was sent into a frenzy when Unity, a leading game engine developer, announced its plan to introduce a Unity Runtime Fee for developers who use their platform. The fee, set to take effect on January 1, 2024, has sparked widespread criticism and concern among game developers. In the midst of this controversy, Facepunch Studios' Garry Newman, founder of Rust, shared his thoughts on the matter, revealing a critical opinion of Unity's approach.

Newman, known for his work on popular titles like Cult of the Lamb and Among Us, expressed disappointment in Unity's decision not to build its own proprietary engine. He emphasized that this lack of investment led to the company being at the mercy of external forces, ultimately affecting the development process. According to Newman, Unity is now pushing developers towards a new business model that prioritizes profit over the interests of game creators.

The introduction of the Unity Runtime Fee has raised concerns about the future of gaming on the platform. Many developers fear that this change will lead to increased costs and potentially even the removal of some popular titles from digital marketplaces. The impact is already being felt, with some high-profile games like Rust facing uncertainty due to the new policy.

In his blog post, Newman shared a personal anecdote about Unity's engine, stating that his team spent 10 years developing Rust on Unity's platform without being informed about the potential fee structure. This lack of transparency has led to frustration and mistrust among developers, many of whom feel that Unity is prioritizing its own interests over those of the gaming community.

While Unity has attempted to mitigate some concerns by clarifying certain aspects of the policy, such as only applying the fee to initial game installations and exempting subscription services like Xbox Game Pass, significant concern remains. The backlash against Unity's decision continues to grow, with many developers questioning whether they will continue using the platform in its current form.

The controversy surrounding Unity's new policy serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability within the gaming industry. As developers navigate this changing landscape, it is crucial that companies prioritize their relationships with game creators, rather than prioritizing profit above all else. For Rust 2 and other titles built on Unity's engine, the future remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the gaming community will continue to adapt and evolve in response to these changes.

In conclusion, Facepunch Studios' critique of Unity serves as a powerful reminder of the need for open communication and collaboration within the gaming industry. As developers face the challenges posed by Unity's new policy, it is essential that they remain vigilant and advocate for their rights and interests. Only through this collective effort can we ensure a bright future for Rust 2 and all games built on Unity's engine.

Rust 2 video game